What is a significant indicator in assessing an ankle sprain according to the CPR for manual therapy?

What is a significant indicator in assessing an ankle sprain according to the CPR for manual therapy?

• A. Navicular drop of 5mm or more
• B. Increased feeling in the toes
• C. Successive pain without movement
• D. Swelling occurring only at night

Answer: (A)

A navicular drop of 5mm or more is a well-established indicator in assessing an ankle sprain, particularly in the context of manual therapy. The navicular bone plays a critical role in the biomechanics of the foot and is closely associated with the arch's integrity. A decrease in the height of the navicular bone, indicated by a drop of 5mm or greater, suggests changes in foot mechanics that could affect stability and contribute to the risk of ankle sprains. Measuring navicular drop helps in evaluating the dynamic stability of the foot during various activities. Individuals with excessive navicular drop may demonstrate altered biomechanics during weight-bearing activities, which could predispose them to ankle sprains or indicate a reliance on compensatory mechanisms due to weakness or instability. The effectiveness of this measure in clinical practice aligns well with evidence-based approaches in assessing and managing ankle sprains, making it a significant indicator in the evaluation process.

A navicular drop of 5mm or more is a well-established indicator in assessing an ankle sprain, particularly in the context of manual therapy. The navicular bone plays a critical role in the biomechanics of the foot and is closely associated with the arch's integrity. A decrease in the height of the navicular bone, indicated by a drop of 5mm or greater, suggests changes in foot mechanics that could affect stability and contribute to the risk of ankle sprains.

Measuring navicular drop helps in evaluating the dynamic stability of the foot during various activities. Individuals with excessive navicular drop may demonstrate altered biomechanics during weight-bearing activities, which could predispose them to ankle sprains or indicate a reliance on compensatory mechanisms due to weakness or instability.

The effectiveness of this measure in clinical practice aligns well with evidence-based approaches in assessing and managing ankle sprains, making it a significant indicator in the evaluation process.